On Jan. 30, the Mercer Island School Board approved Superintendent Dr. Fred Rundle’s performance review with a 4-1 vote, but not without mixed reactions.

The agenda included the Mary Wayte Pool Project, district finances, budget priorities and legislative updates, along with a heated public comment session. Dr. Rundle’s review took center stage at the meeting.

Community support for Dr. Rundle

Seven community members, including representatives from the PTA, Mercer Island Schools Foundation, Mercer Island Community Fund, and school administration, voiced their support for Dr. Rundle’s leadership.

Robin Li, a PTA member and school volunteer, praised Rundle’s leadership, saying she “never felt more hopeful and optimistic” and supported iReady Math for differentiated learning.

Meghan Banta, president of the Mercer Island Schools Foundation, expressed gratitude for the board’s unanimous support of the bond and commended Dr. Rundle’s investment in resources, such as a dyslexia intervention pilot program.

Sharon Perez of the Mercer Island Community Fund described Rundle’s leadership as “marked by integrity and transparency.”

Lisa Deen, associate principal at Mercer Island High School, highlighted Rundle’s “data-driven decision-making” and commitment to equity and student success.

Sarah Karim, president-elect of Mercer Island PTA Council, appreciated Dr. Rundle’s “efforts to ensure a safe and inclusive learning environment for all MISD students.”

Jaymee Lundin, a PTA member, applauded his efforts in creating an inclusive environment for LGBTQIA+ students and his “swift and thoughtful response” to a recent antisemitic incident at Islander Middle School.

Julie Hsieh, Mercer Island PTA Council Reflections Chair, passionately credited Dr. Rundle for his “support and commitment to our amazing Fine Arts program.”

Board members on superintendent’s performance

Board members discussed and approved Dr. Rundle’s performance review, with Director Dan Glowitz casting the sole dissenting vote. Glowitz cited multiple concerns, including:

• Lack of SAT testing opportunities.

• Middle school policies discouraging homework.

• Increased reliance on iPads in elementary classrooms.

• Financial instability and concerns over bond allocations.

• A culture of fear where parents and board members feel retaliated against for asking questions.

“We aren’t heading in the direction that the community wants, and we should consider plotting a different course,” Glowitz stated.

In contrast, Director Deborah Lurie praised Dr. Rundle’s leadership, resilience and adaptability, particularly his implementation of a phone-free policy. She affirmed her continued support during her final year on the board.

Director Maggie Tai Tucker commended Rundle for improving district communication and navigating a community of high-achieving individuals with strong personalities. She also praised his positive attitude and growth mindset.

Director Cristina Martinez emphasized the board’s role in helping Dr. Rundle grow as a leader to “ensure that every student reaches their potential.” She highlighted his commitment to fostering a sense of belonging and expressed support for his efforts in academic, emotional and mental health initiatives.

Director Jody Lee stated that she has “complete confidence and appreciation” for Dr. Rundle’s leadership.

Public comment

Nine community members spoke during the public comment session. Longtime resident Seth Landau criticized the board and superintendent for “holding secret meetings” and fostering an environment where parents “fear retribution from a school board or superintendent.” He distributed a document received from parents containing Director Jody Lee’s personal social media posts and called for her to “resign immediately.” Landau also questioned whether the proposed bond funds would be used for salaries and expenses typically covered by the general fund.

In response, Director Jody Lee issued a statement: “Last week, a member of our community chose to trawl through years of my personal social media to attack me personally rather than focusing on any actions or communications I have made as a school board director. This type of ad hominem attack is misleading and disappointing. I remain focused on doing my best for our students and our schools.”

Screenshots of board direct… by andy.hobbs

Former Mercer Island City Councilmember Tom Acker also spoke, reporting that 50 parents had reached out to him expressing concerns over “retaliation and toxicity” within the district. He also called for a review of the math program and bond proposal, stating, “There have to be significant changes with this board.”

Linnea Augustine is a Mercer Island resident and volunteer contributor to the Mercer Island Reporter. Email editor@mi-reporter.com.